kawasaki status not a mistake

I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt and ask if his "seldom attends church" status was for real, and explained that it matters to me. his answer:

"its correct at the moment but I have nothing against it! but thanks anyway! good luck!"

one must wonder just why, if that's how he feels, he wanted the attention of someone who does attend regularly?

another engagement!

Last night, my older sister, who had just returned from a little vacation, flashed her newly bejeweled left hand under my nose. I didn't get the full details (she was tired and ready to head for home before she collapsed - you know how traveling can wear you out), but apparently he proposed at Disneyland. How sweet!
Congrats, big sis!

brief update

You may have been wondering if I'm hiding something, or ignoring the singles scene, or what. For a while there, I couldn't access the singles site from work, and since my boys dominate the computer at home, which in any case is not my favorite thing (the computer itself is great, the connection is very reliable, but the monitor is a dinosaur and the seating/desk is less than ideal), that meant that I opted to ignore it rather than go out of my way just to see who "kawasaki" is. But that's fixed now, so no more excuses.
"kawasaki" has indeed been persistently sending flirts and messages anyway, but alas, his profile, while otherwise not objectionable in any way that matters, states that he "seldom attends church". This may be an over site on his part, but then again, it might not.
Do I need to be more specific in my own profile? I truly have no interest in a man who doesn't have a testimony and a driving need to be a part of this church. Is it not sufficient that I mention my own conviction/commitment? Do I have to spell it out in order to stop receiving attention from the less than committed? hmm. If the less-than's can't see what I mean without my spelling it out, maybe they are also a bit dim otherwise as well, and best ignored?